I didn't study finance. I didn't plan any of this. I became a financial planner by accident — and I think that's exactly why it works.
I didn't come to financial planning through finance. There was no grand plan, no career strategy, no moment where I thought "yes, this is clearly the path." What there was, mostly, was a series of accidents — some fortunate, some bewildering — that somehow led to a career I genuinely love and have now been doing for almost eighteen years.
Here's the honest version of how I got here — because I think it's relevant to everything that follows.
I was admitted into Civil Engineering out of school. Quit after three months. Not because it was too hard — it just wasn't right. I took the year off with no clear plan, which is an uncomfortable place to be at eighteen. A friend suggested we both enrol in a Bachelor of Arts. His reasoning was essentially: you're not doing anything useful sitting at home, and at least this keeps you moving. Hard to argue with that logic.
I looked at the subjects. Didn't like Economics — the graphs and aggregate demand curves left me cold. Wasn't drawn to Literature either. Psychology, though — that was different. Something about it made immediate sense. How people think. Why they behave the way they do. What drives decisions that seem, on the surface, irrational. I didn't know then how useful that would turn out to be.
From there, I came to Australia to study Hospitality. Still wasn't sure what I wanted. Spent a decade working in that industry — which teaches you things about people that no classroom covers. You learn how to read a room. You learn that the way someone behaves when they're under pressure, or uncomfortable, or trying to impress, tells you more about them than anything they say directly. I didn't realise at the time that I was building skills I'd use for the rest of my career.
A sabbatical followed. And then — on the advice of a close friend who remains one to this day — I joined a bank as a teller. Not a glamorous entry point. But I worked through several branch roles, got progressively more exposure to how people interacted with their money, and eventually crossed paths with financial planning through the branch network. Something clicked. I thought: this is where psychology and numbers meet. This is the work.
That was almost eighteen years ago. I've been doing it since, and I still think it's my calling — which is not something I've been able to say about much else.
What I didn't expect was how little of the job would actually be about finance.
The thing I got wrong at the start
When I first moved into financial planning, I made an assumption that most people in the industry probably make: that the value I was adding was primarily technical. Better strategy. Smarter structure. The right product in the right wrapper at the right time. I knew I had an unusual background for an adviser — psychology, hospitality, banking — but I thought of those things as interesting context rather than the point.
"Get the strategy right and the outcomes will follow. The technical work is what matters most."
"Get the relationship right. Understand what money actually means to this person. The technical work is the easy part — and it only lands if the rest is working."
This doesn't mean the technical work doesn't matter. It does — enormously. A poorly structured super contribution, a lapsed insurance nomination, a tax decision made without considering the three-year picture can cost clients real money. Getting those things right is non-negotiable.
But I've sat across from clients who had technically excellent financial plans — well-structured, well-diversified, appropriate for their situation — and watched them make decisions that undermined those plans entirely. Not because they didn't understand them. Because something emotional was running underneath that nobody had addressed.
It took me a few years to realise that everything I thought was background — the psychology, the decade in hospitality reading people, the years in banking watching how ordinary people actually relate to money — wasn't incidental to the work. It was the work. The finance part I learned on the job. The people part I'd been learning my whole life without realising it.
The pattern that kept showing up
If I had to name the single most consistent thing I've observed across hundreds of client conversations over seventeen years, it's this: the emotional relationship people have with money almost always matters more than the technical one.
Money carries weight that has nothing to do with mathematics. It carries fear — the fear of not having enough, of losing what's been built, of becoming dependent, of dying with regrets, of making the wrong call. It carries identity — what we spend says something about who we are, or who we think we should be. It carries family history — attitudes toward money are often inherited as unconsciously as eye colour, and they shape behaviour in ways people rarely examine.
I've never had a client who struggled because they didn't understand compound interest. I've had many who struggled because money meant something to them — security, control, love, status, safety — that no spreadsheet could address.
The pattern I kept seeing, for years before I fully understood it, was this: clients who appeared to have everything sorted — good income, solid assets, sensible super — making decisions that seemed, on the surface, irrational. Holding too much cash because the market felt "uncertain." Refusing to spend in retirement despite having more than enough, because spending felt like losing. Working years longer than they needed to because stopping felt like disappearing.
None of these were financial problems. They were emotional ones wearing financial clothes.
- The client who has plenty — objectively, demonstrably plenty — but can't bring themselves to spend it. FORO: the Fear Of Running Out. It persists regardless of the balance.
- The high earner who has almost nothing saved. Income is visible and immediate; the future is abstract and distant. The gap between knowing and doing is wider than most people realise.
- The couple who have never had a direct conversation about money in twenty years of marriage. Two completely different frameworks, operating in parallel, occasionally colliding.
- The person who delays getting advice for years because starting feels like confronting something they'd rather not know. By the time they walk in, they've already paid a significant cost in lost time.
- The client who knows exactly what they should do — and doesn't do it. Not because the advice was wrong. Because knowing and doing are genuinely different skills, and most people need help with the second one.
- The retiree who feels a vague sense of guilt about not working — even when retirement was the plan, and the plan is working. Identity and income are more entangled than most people expect them to be.
Once I started seeing these patterns clearly, everything about how I work changed. I ask different questions now. I spend more time at the beginning of a relationship understanding what money actually means to someone — what they're afraid of, what they're working toward, what would genuinely feel like success — before we ever talk about strategy.
The moment that changed things
I want to share a conversation — anonymised, because that matters — that shifted something permanently in how I think about this work.
A client came in a number of years ago. Late 50s. Technically, his financial position was strong. Super was solid. Mortgage almost gone. A portfolio that had grown quietly for two decades. By any objective measure, he had done everything right.
We were going through his plan — updating the projections, reviewing the strategy — and I asked him, fairly routinely, what he was hoping retirement would look like. He paused for longer than I expected. Then he said something that I still think about regularly.
"Honestly? I've spent so long making sure we'd be okay that I've never actually thought about what okay looks like. I've been so focused on not running out that I've forgotten to think about what I'd be running toward."
We spent the rest of that meeting — and several that followed — not on his portfolio at all. We talked about what he actually wanted. Not retirement as a financial event. Retirement as a life. What would he do with Tuesdays? What would give the weeks structure? What had he put off for thirty years that was still possible?
It was some of the most valuable work we'd done together. And it had nothing to do with the numbers.
That conversation crystallised something I'd been circling for years: financial planning is not primarily about money. It's about what money makes possible — and that's a much more interesting, and much more personal, conversation.
What seventeen years has taught me — in plain language
If I try to distil everything I've observed into the lessons that have actually changed how I work, these are the ones that have held up.
What this means for how we work
I started Diligent Financial Planning in 2015 because I wanted to build something that reflected these lessons — not just technically, but structurally. Fee-only and self-licensed, because I didn't want commercial incentives sitting between me and the advice I was giving. Small by design, because the relationship matters and relationships don't scale infinitely.
The conversations I value most aren't the ones where I've found a clever tax structure or optimised a portfolio allocation. They're the ones where someone has walked out with a clearer picture of what they actually want — and a realistic plan for how to get there. Where the financial work is in service of something larger and more personal than a balance sheet.
That's the work. Seventeen years in, it still gets interesting.
Chintan Engineer is the founder and principal financial planner at Diligent Financial Planning. He has been in financial planning since 2008. Get in touch if you'd like to start a conversation.
This article represents the personal reflections and observations of Chintan Engineer and is intended as general commentary only. It does not constitute personal financial advice. All client references are anonymised and paraphrased. No individual client has been identified. Before acting on any financial information, you should seek personalised advice from a qualified financial adviser.
Chintan Engineer (AR No. 1006106) is an Authorised Representative of Diligent Financial Services Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 535390). Prepared on behalf of Diligent Financial Planning Pty Ltd (AR No. 1234150). This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without the permission of Diligent Financial Planning.